Difficulty Comparisons
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:03 am
(Apologies if this is in the wrong section)
So, I was wondering for those veteran long warriors who have had experience with LW1 (I didn't personally), and possibly the devs and their personal thoughts.
One of the things that LW1 was widely known for was its difficulty, and from my initial experiences LW2 is the same case. Some missions are downright brutal, some unwinnable, and an important part of the strategy is realizing a no-win scenario.
But for those who have played both, even if not as much experience with LW2 (obviously, it did just come out after all), how do they compare? Both have a big difficulty increase from vanilla, but which one is harder from your experiences so far?
So, I was wondering for those veteran long warriors who have had experience with LW1 (I didn't personally), and possibly the devs and their personal thoughts.
One of the things that LW1 was widely known for was its difficulty, and from my initial experiences LW2 is the same case. Some missions are downright brutal, some unwinnable, and an important part of the strategy is realizing a no-win scenario.
But for those who have played both, even if not as much experience with LW2 (obviously, it did just come out after all), how do they compare? Both have a big difficulty increase from vanilla, but which one is harder from your experiences so far?